Looking forward to be a speaker on March 11th at TheCloudFirst, the cloud native conference, and talk about one of my favorite topics, serverless databases on AWS.
For the first time, I will cover the preview of Aurora Serverless v2, the new serverless MySQL compatible database announced by AWS at re:Invent 2020.
Is Serverless the Future of Relational Databases?
From AWS to Google Cloud, the major cloud providers offer different options to run a relational database on the cloud. You can spin up virtual machines and configure your own cluster or rely on managed services. But the new trend is serverless (relational) databases that offer both traditional interfaces and HTTP API access. This talk is personal journey on AWS moving from a managed MySQL to a serverless Aurora. Can serverless really be the future for the enterprise databases?
The conference will run for 28 hours on 20-21 October 2020 and will cover topics on Open Source Databases and Applications using MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and MariaDB. You can find the full agenda online and register for free.
Is serverless the future of relational databases? Looking forward to be part of DeveloperWeek Global: Cloud Conference, one of the world’s largest virtual software developer event series, and discuss relational databases on the cloud. See you online at the end of September! More about my talk here.
AWS has recently made AWS Wavelength zones in San Francisco and Boston available to provide a subset of their computing services on Verizon datacenters. The new zones will allow developers to build applications that can benefit from the ultra-low latency of the mobile carriers.
HashiCorp, the company behind the software tool Terraform, introduces a platform to run their products on AWS, Azure, and GCP as managed services. This will extend their enterprise offer with a focus on multi-cloud environments.
At re:Invent in Las Vegas in December 2019, AWS announced the public preview of RDS Proxy, a fully managed database proxy that sits between your application and RDS. The new service offers to “share established database connections, improving database efficiency and application scalability”.
One of the key features was the ability to increase application availability, significantly reducing failover times on a Multi AZ RDS instance. Results were indeed impressive.
But a key limitation was that there was no opportunity to change the instance size or class once the proxy has been created. That means it could not be used to reduce downtime during a vertical scaling of the cluster and made the deployment less elastic.
Time for a second look?
Last week AWS announced finally the GA of RDS Proxy and I thought it was a good time to take a second look at the service. Any further improvements in the failover? Can you now change the instance size once the proxy has been created?
One of the first and few values you should choose when you set up an Amazon RDS Proxy is it the idle client connection timeout. It is already hard to figure out the optimal value in an ideal scenario. But having a user interface that suggests a default of 30 minutes with a label that states “Max: 5 minutes” makes it more difficult. Almost all if the drop down list let you set any value up to 1 hour.
Let us play!
I created again a test-rds and a test-proxy and I decided to perform the very same basic tests I did last December. I started two while loops in Bash, relying on the MySQL client, each one asking every 2 seconds the current date and time to the database:
$ while true; do mysql -s -N -h test-proxy.proxy-***.eu-central-1.rds.amazonaws.com -u testuser -e "select now()"; sleep 2; done
$ while true; do mysql -s -N -h test-rds.***.eu-central-1.rds.amazonaws.com -u testuser -e "select now()"; sleep 2; done
The difference between the test-proxy and the test-rds is significant: it takes 132 seconds for the RDS endpoint to recover versus only 20 seconds for the proxy. Amazing difference and even better than what AWS promises in a more reliable and significant test.
But what happens when I trigger a change of the instance type?
While the numbers for the test-rds do not change significantly, the proxy is simply gone. Once the database cluster behind changes, the proxy endpoint is still available but it does not connect to the database anymore. Changing time out does not help, with no simple way to recover.
ERROR 9501 (HY000) at line 1: Timed-out waiting to acquire database connection ERROR 9501 (HY000) at line 1: Timed-out waiting to acquire database connection ERROR 9501 (HY000) at line 1: Timed-out waiting to acquire database connection ERROR 9501 (HY000) at line 1: Timed-out waiting to acquire database connection ERROR 9501 (HY000) at line 1: Timed-out waiting to acquire database connection
Amazon RDS Proxy is a very interesting service. And it could be an essential component in many deployments where increase application availability is critical. But I would have expect a few more improvements since the first preview. The lack of support for changes of the instances makes it still hard to integrate it in many scenarios where RDS is currently used.
Yesterday I had the chance to talk live with Federico Razzoli about cost optimization on the cloud, with the main focus on relational databases. How to save a few dollars running MySQL on AWS? What about RDS? Check out the video, hope you find some useful tips!